|
A
Deeper Discussion
-
The
"Wealth Rule" is deceptively simple. However, the
ongoing research shows that it is far from simple due to the
dynamics of life, economy and markets.
-
This is not to say that the rule
doesn't work. On the contrary, it does work. What is also required
is actively managing resources in retirement just as income
and assets are managed during the working years.
-
Results
of various studies concerning withdrawal rates have ranged between
a conservative 3% to an aggressive 8%, depending on the study's
assumptions:
-
Do you start with a constant withdrawal rate based on
initial value, regardless of the subsequent portfolio
value? Or do you adjust the withdrawal amount as the
value changes?
-
Portfolio management similar
to endowments or foundations with differences mainly in declining
market conditions.
-
Constant withdrawal rate posses
no problems during a rising market and in fact would provide
increasing withdrawal amounts over time.
Better
to take most of the gains and position them in a reserve portfolio
discussed below.
o Constant withdrawal rate during a declining portfolio value
would result in reducing amounts over time.
o Reduced
payouts often posses a problem for retirees since it is hard to
adjust living expenses downward.
o Necessitates a hybrid approach
to manage declining market conditions
-
Beyond
the scope of this discussion but highlights include:
o Pre-establish
a "trigger point" where withdrawals from the main portfolio
stop to reduce the "stress on the portfolio" due to
withdrawals that now represent a higher percentage of value.
o Pre-establish
a reserve portfolio constructed more conservatively and with sufficient
assets, for a predetermined time, from which to start the withdrawals.
o Begin
to look at what living expenses can be reduced to further reduce
the stresses on both portfolios.
o
In reality, this is exactly what people do when they
are in their working years during changing (declining) economic conditions;
they will reduce their expenditures when their income is reduced.
Different Expense Categories to Plan for in Retirement
(also helpful while you are working).*
Once you recognize these three
categories of expenses, you can see how to make sensible adjustments
to your income during your working years as well as during
retirement. You should make these expense categories part of your
budget or cash flow by placing your expenses into each of the three.
Once you have done this, it becomes clear which category you should
cut back first, and then second, etc., with income reductions during
your working years, and weathering a market decline during your
retirement years.
1)
Survival Expenses.
This expense category is the
absolute necessary expenses required to keep you sheltered,
clothed, and fed. They include utilities, rent, or mortgage
including the property insurance and taxes, proper seasonal
clothing for your climate and finally, food you eat at home.
This would also include the necessary transportation
expenses for you to get to essential locations like work,
medical, grocery store, etc.
2)
Desired Expenses.
This expense category consists of
those that bring you a higher quality of life such as eating
out, entertainment and the additional travel expenses
associated with these activities. This category would also
include more transportation than you need basically, such as
a more expensive car or a second car
3)
Supplemental Expenses.
This expense category consists of
additional things that are nice to have such as travel, a
boat or other water vehicles, etc. This category also
includes those unexpected expenses that having reserves
saved/invested conservatively for makes sense.
During the working years, the income
flows through these expense categories without much thought. This
needs to change so people can make smarter planning decisions in
preparation for either ceasing or declining income while working.
This habit of “giving it no thought” is what causes people problems
during the transitional years and retirement years. Let’s look at
the retirement income sources and apply them to these expense
categories to see how this can be helpful. This discussion is in the
order or cutting back and/or eliminating the expenses.
Supplemental Expenses are, by
definition, unnecessary expenditures when markets are not doing
well. Eliminate the expenses as soon as possible to maintain the
retirement assets so they can support expenditures that are more
important.
Desired Expenses are a category that
could be reduced or eliminated should the need arise due to
market declines (or reduced working income). In retirement
therefore, rather than get an annuity to support these expenses
and use those assets to try and support a higher standard of
living permanently, the assets can be kept in a properly
diversified portfolio. While the portfolio is doing well these
expenses can be funded; when the portfolio does not do well,
these expenses can be reduced or skipped to the extent possible
so these assets are available for more important expenditures.
You get the sense of “stressing the portfolio” for Desired and
Supplemental Expenses when the withdrawals from the portfolio
begin to exceed the “Wealth Rule” percentage you established.
Example, you established your withdrawal rate as 5%; and due to
market declines, that same withdrawal amount in dollars now
represents 6% which says you are withdrawing more as a percent
of assets, hence putting stress on the portfolio to be able to
sustain this over a great length of time.
Obviously, it is critical that you
support your Survival Expenses while retired. The income sources
to do this are Social Security, and/or a pension if one is
employer provided. This is also a very good expense category to
look into purchasing an annuity to insure that you can fund
these expenses that you can not support through Social Security
or a pension. Annuities are constantly changing and are beyond
the scope of this discussion; however, the pooling and insuring
mechanisms are helpful for this category.
Structuring your thoughts in this manner
provide you the most flexibility to be able to adjust your resources
as time goes on. Setting something up in concrete today may feel
good, but it is not flexible enough to adjust to changes that
inevitably happen over a period of 10, 20, or more years in
retirement.
*Note: This
concept is not discussed in the book. It is a helpful concept and
will be included in a future edition of the book.
Page updated 9 Oct 06
Site
Designed By:

|